Choice Review
Cartwright (Univ. of Maryland, College Park) tackles one of the big questions about 16th-century English drama: Where did the brilliant human portraits of the second half of the century come from? The author argues that scholars have overstated the debt to popular and folk drama, in so doing neglecting the influence of humanist classicizing. The point bears making, though Cartwright does harp too often on one string: the conflict in humanist drama between precept and experience. The author's real interest, and the book's real strength, lies elsewhere: Cartwright insightfully explores how Tudor playwrights developed over the century the rhythms of affective response in their viewers. Members of the audience craved ever more of the dramatic stimulus that playwrights learned to provide; viewers were forever satisfied, yet forever in need of more. Particularly useful are discussions of Gammer Gurton's Needle and Gorboduc from the middle of the century. The volume concludes with chapters on Lyly's Gallathea, Marlowe's Tamburlaine, and Greene's Friar Bacon, which demonstrate the force of Cartwright's affective approach. Recommended for graduate collections and for large undergraduate libraries. E. D. Hill; Mount Holyoke College