Publisher's Weekly Review
Rather than rely on Kubrick's classic film, Schiavone, founder and former director of the Istituto Italiano di Scienze Umane, depends on the accounts of ancient scribes, historical time lines, and the author's own observations to reconstruct the fabled first-century B.C.E. slave revolt and its legendary leader. The author's goal is to separate the man from the myth and provide a more accurate historical context, and while his account is thorough and interesting, his heavy-handed emphasis on the movements and clashes of armies and the vilifying of the Roman Empire draws the focus away from his subject. Nevertheless, it's clear that Schiavone (The Invention of the Law in the West) is extremely knowledgeable about Roman history, and he does provide a new take on the Spartacus tale, showing that the revolt was not a spontaneous uprising; it was a deliberate and strategic strike against the Roman Empire. The text moves smoothly between narrative and historical analysis, meaning both the newcomer and the experienced Roman historian will find a wealth of entertainment and information. 3 maps. (Mar.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Booklist Review
We can be reasonably certain about a few facts regarding Spartacus and the massive slave revolt he led in Italy in the first century BCE. He escaped from a gladiatorial training school, attracted thousands of followers, won several victories against Roman legions, and was defeated and presumably killed in a battle against vastly superior Roman forces. As for the rest, including his character, goals, and personal life, we are left with contradictory sources, speculation, and myth. Schiavone has strived admirably to glean additional truth from this morass. He accepts, as have others, that Spartacus was a Thracian who served as a Roman auxiliary soldier until he deserted for unexplained reasons. He may have then briefly survived as a sort of guerrilla bandit until his capture and enslavement. Schiavone credibly dismisses the idea that Spartacus was some sort of proto-Marxist class warrior; instead, he sees Spartacus as a consummate soldier who was most comfortable fighting, but he doesn't make clear what he fought for, aside from his own freedom. Still, this is a highly readable, interesting inquiry into a man and a movement that will never be fully understood.--Freeman, Jay Copyright 2010 Booklist
Choice Review
Eminent Italian scholar Schiavone (Instituto Italiano di Scienze Umane, Italy) deals with the great slave uprising that devastated Roman Italy in 73-71 BCE. Its leader, Spartacus, emerges as both a master of military organization and tactics and an astute political leader who aimed at nothing less than the overthrow of Rome's hegemony. The author argues convincingly that the economic and social structures of the ancient world made it inevitable that Spartacus could not rely on class consciousness in the rural areas and could not gain the support of any city. So his failure was inevitable, but it took eight Roman legions--over 50,000 soldiers--to bring him down. Keith Bradley's Slavery and Rebellion in the Roman World (CH, May'90, 27-5268) puts Spartacus in the context of similar slave revolts, and Barry Strauss's The Spartacus War (CH, Feb'10, 47-3326) pays more attention to topographic and military aspects, but no work explains so well and so briefly both the triumphs and ultimate failure of Spartacus. Summing Up: Highly recommended. All general, public, and undergraduate libraries. R. I. Frank emeritus, University of California, Irvine
Library Journal Review
In this slender volume, Schiavone (Roman law, Instituto Italiano di Scienze Umane, Florence) argues that Spartacus was not just a slave in revolt but a foreign chieftain intent on displacing Rome's power on the Italic peninsula. Further, Schiavone wishes to rescue Spartacus from centuries of mythmaking and to ground his biography solely in historical fact, supplementing the scant record with contextual information about the period and Mediterranean slavery. All the while, he aims to appeal to both generalists and academics. Not prone to overly imaginative speculation as are Barry Strauss in The Spartacus War and Adrienne Mayor in The Poison King, about Mithradates, a contemporary Roman foe, Schiavone does an excellent job evaluating sources and admitting when scholars do not have all the facts. This forthright approach, and his discussion of slavery, are his book's strongest points. Unfortunately, his argument about Spartacus's motives is unpersuasive as he fails to address satisfactorily the classical tendency to make Rome's foes look greater than they were in order to magnify Roman triumphs. He also leaves out too much information for generalists to grasp fully the historical context. VERDICT Not engaging enough or clear enough for a generalist, and not argued soundly enough for a scholar, this should be considered an optional purchase.-Evan Anderson, Iowa State Univ. Lib., Ames (c) Copyright 2013. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.